Went with a Chinese friend I haven't seen in a year to MoMA where we enjoyed the just-opened exhibition of utopian fantasies of the Congolese autodidact-become-international-star Bodys Isez Kingelez. But of course we talked about the more dystopian turns in our own lands.
Wednesday, May 30, 2018
Labyrinthine
I was interviewed for a high school student's documentary on science and religion today. Lots of fun! Of course I didn't answer any of his questions. But what I gave instead interested the interviewer and his cameraman enough that we continued well past the appointed time, and they asked me about what classes to take at college so they might have more discussions like this one. So as you can imagine...
To "Are you unnerved by the things science can't explain?" I asked what was meant - dark matter and energy - and said I wasn't unnerved at all, that religion is all about things that can't be explained, about accepting that there are things unknown. Not all religion, of course...
To "Do you think religion and science can be reconciled?" I responded by observing that 'reconciled' suggests they're two static things, when neither is. Better to think of each as something that changes with time, adjusting to, responding to, deepening itself in response to new discoveries. (Not all religion, of course...)
To "How do Christians think the world began?" I responded by exploding 'Christians' and then talked about the very different ways different folks understand the very first words of Genesis. "In the beginning..." doesn't necessarily mean the very beginning, the beginning of everything (where did those waters the spirit hovered over come from, etc.) but just of this account, which may be what we need. The important thing in Genesis, to certain kinds of Christians and Jews at least, is the repeated determination of each thing called into being: it was good.
To "How do Hindus think the world began?" I of course told them about Wendy Doniger's celebration of the great multitude of Hindu cosmogonies, the better for responding to whatever we might need. Buddhism was no better, and then there's the cyclical understanding of time...
My answers kept pointing to the power of stories (contrasted both with explanation and the story"), and to rituals. The cameraman turned the focus of our attention to ethics. And we ended up talking about how good it would be if philosophy, ethics, religion were taught in schools - which, I suggested, ought to include some experiences of ritualized activity, whether it be walking a labyrinth, or slow walking meditation. (Both I described recalling experiences at retreats. Perhaps I should should set aside time for a retreat this summer, too!)
The labyrinth walk, with others snaking their own way through, leading to always surprising encounters and divergences, became the model for a life that is shared with other beings over time (at first just other people, then the rest of creation), and the demands of living into it. The slow-motion walking became the occasion for the startled discovery that our effortless shifting of bones, muscles and weight in each step is a mystery of attunement (and the slowing down a model for science and religion)... which brought us back to it is good!
To "Are you unnerved by the things science can't explain?" I asked what was meant - dark matter and energy - and said I wasn't unnerved at all, that religion is all about things that can't be explained, about accepting that there are things unknown. Not all religion, of course...
To "Do you think religion and science can be reconciled?" I responded by observing that 'reconciled' suggests they're two static things, when neither is. Better to think of each as something that changes with time, adjusting to, responding to, deepening itself in response to new discoveries. (Not all religion, of course...)
To "How do Christians think the world began?" I responded by exploding 'Christians' and then talked about the very different ways different folks understand the very first words of Genesis. "In the beginning..." doesn't necessarily mean the very beginning, the beginning of everything (where did those waters the spirit hovered over come from, etc.) but just of this account, which may be what we need. The important thing in Genesis, to certain kinds of Christians and Jews at least, is the repeated determination of each thing called into being: it was good.
To "How do Hindus think the world began?" I of course told them about Wendy Doniger's celebration of the great multitude of Hindu cosmogonies, the better for responding to whatever we might need. Buddhism was no better, and then there's the cyclical understanding of time...
My answers kept pointing to the power of stories (contrasted both with explanation and the story"), and to rituals. The cameraman turned the focus of our attention to ethics. And we ended up talking about how good it would be if philosophy, ethics, religion were taught in schools - which, I suggested, ought to include some experiences of ritualized activity, whether it be walking a labyrinth, or slow walking meditation. (Both I described recalling experiences at retreats. Perhaps I should should set aside time for a retreat this summer, too!)
The labyrinth walk, with others snaking their own way through, leading to always surprising encounters and divergences, became the model for a life that is shared with other beings over time (at first just other people, then the rest of creation), and the demands of living into it. The slow-motion walking became the occasion for the startled discovery that our effortless shifting of bones, muscles and weight in each step is a mystery of attunement (and the slowing down a model for science and religion)... which brought us back to it is good!
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
Everything in the forest is the forest
How will we understand ourselves differently because of what we are learning about/from trees? Richard Powers has one of his characters discover it in a northwestern forest:
The Overstory: A Novel (Norton, 2018), 144
(Yet "we" have a problem, like the Anthropocene so White one. Powers introduces eight characters in his first 150 pages: Nicholas Hoel, Mimi Ma, Adam Appich, Ray Brinkman and Dorothy Cazaly, Douglas Pavlicek, Neelay Mehta, Patricia Westerford and Olivia Vandergriff. Mimi is the daughter of a Chinese refugee scholar, Mehta the child of two Indians. Everyone else is white. (Everyone is apparently straight, though Powers lets Westerford have a brief moment with another woman, before, years later, folding her into comfortable heterosexuality - even as she's discovered the queerness of nature!) This is a settler colonist's novel about America (the Hoels are actual settlers), claiming kinship with ancient trees but barely noticing the Native peoples of the land, or the African Americans who have worked it longer than almost all his characters' families gave been here. Incomplete fusion of human roots! What's that saying about seeing the forest for the trees?)
Monday, May 28, 2018
The sacred, progressively enlarged
Benoît Vermander uses Confucian tradition to beautifully balance the rigid sacred/profane dichotomy in modern western theory of religion:
The Latin-based lexicon Durkheim used draws a sharp distinction between sacred and profane. … In ancient Chinese thought, the meaning of any concept deemed central to the understand of human and cosmic realities will be progressively enlarged. Going one step further, the relationship between the cardinal Confucian virtues of ritual (sense of propriety, ritual expertise) and benevolence (ren) suggests a corrective to the sacred/profane dichotomy: While the sacred/profane dichotomy is about discontinuities, Chinese texts and terminology stress necessary continuation in life processes Different orders in collective existence are associated with different models of conduct. There are different space-times (including the ones induced by the distinction between sacrifices and festivals, on the one hand, and everyday work and life, on the other), but their alternation and combination are indispensable for ensuring the community’s sustainability as a whole. Ritual observance allows one to lead life based on benevolence, while the deployment of benevolence enables one to express to the fullest the inner meaning of ritual. Then the distinction between the sacred and the profane is better perceived as a continuum.
Shanghai Sacred: The Religious Landscape of a Global City
(University of Washington Press, 2018), 9-10
(University of Washington Press, 2018), 9-10
Sunday, May 27, 2018
Saturday, May 26, 2018
Friday, May 25, 2018
End of the rainbow
Two books I have a very peripheral connection to have appeared recently. Shanghai Sacred is an ethnographic study of Shanghai religions with gorgeous photographs; I provided some comments of some early drafts during my year there. Benoît, the main author, was effectively my host at Fudan, and Liz, the main photographer, became a friend too. They took me on a few of their expeditions (including Jinze), and I also provided them one connection - to the Rainbow Witness Fellowship, a gay Christian group I'd become involved with. Liz' discreet photo from a Rainbow event, taken after I'd left Fudan, is characteristically lovely:
Rainbow is also where I met Eros, the editor of May your lips kiss mine, an anthology of writing by and about LGBT Catholics in China and the broader Chinese diaspora. I think I planted one of many seeds for it when I told Eros I thought there'd be interest in the sorts of stories shared at Rainbow meetings well beyond China. He pulled it together in record time, and has apparently already found many grateful readers - including Catholic priests, who have received no guidance for ministering to the tongzhi in their congregations. I'm helping smooth out the translations for an English version, moved by each chapter I read.
Rainbow is also where I met Eros, the editor of May your lips kiss mine, an anthology of writing by and about LGBT Catholics in China and the broader Chinese diaspora. I think I planted one of many seeds for it when I told Eros I thought there'd be interest in the sorts of stories shared at Rainbow meetings well beyond China. He pulled it together in record time, and has apparently already found many grateful readers - including Catholic priests, who have received no guidance for ministering to the tongzhi in their congregations. I'm helping smooth out the translations for an English version, moved by each chapter I read.
Thursday, May 24, 2018
Songs of hope
At the recent conference on religion and the Anthropocene, the only reference to trees - at least the only explicit one - was made by me. So consumed were we with coming to terms with the human - itself a morally problematic simplification - as a "planetary agent" that our discussion touched only peripherally on non-human life, even as it is the biosphere as a whole we now realize we're affecting. There was much talk, of course, of the extinction of species, but when spelled out these seem always to have been animals - along, of course, with their habitats.
I can't claim to have contributed much: it was just a question to a panel, wondering if they found the recent literature on plants significant (they did not). I also asked a plant biologist turned Catholic theologian about it informally, and was told that the anthropomorphism involved in speaking of "the intelligence of plants" is unhelpful.
But I'd just finished David George Haskell's The Songs of Trees: Stories from Nature's Great Communicators, and it seemed unconscionable - and foolish - not to heed the voices of trees. Haskell's is a wonderful book in many ways, not least for its gorgeous writing. Hear him sing:
Better than Plato, in fact:
Unlike Plato, who sought through beauty to find invariant universals that exist beyond the caved-in mess of human politics and society, ecological aesthetics and ethics emerge from relationships within life's community. They are context dependent, but a contingent near-universality may emerge when many parts of the network converge on similar judgments. (152-53)
Trees, it seemed to me at the conference, might be mediators - arbiters, even - between the time of humans and geological time. In any case, their thoroughly networked existence explodes the pretensions of species autarky, and, indeed, of individuality. His book, divided into chapters each dedicated to a particular tree with which he spent extended time over several years, starts in the Amazonian rainforest with the towering ceibo, home to a world of separate ecosystems.
It is perhaps no coincidence that the ceibo tree is the tree of life in the Waorani creation story. The tree is a hub for so many forest creatures, and it saves lives be maintaining and reconnecting life-giving threads.
This dissolution of individuality into relationship is how the ceibo and all its community survive the rigors of the forest. Where the art of war is so supremely well developed, survival paradoxically involves surrender, giving up the self in a union with allies. (16)
This "surrender" or "unselfing" (a term he borrows from moral philosopher Iris Murdoch) is at the heart of the stories Haskell tells, whether of social insects, symbioses of plants, animals and fungi, or - most provocatively - of the mysteriously emergent cooperation of individual (sic) components of plants, from roots and branches to the pores of leaves. Has it something to teach us about being human? It certainly has something tell us about life on earth, and how estranged from it our knotted brains and wandering hearts may have made us.
As I fiddle with making something more of my own presentation - a guess at how the Book of Job's song will be heard once people have accepted the realities of the Anthropocene - I'm tempted to make trees the hinge of the story. Most contemporary readers, if they attend to the many nature references in the text at all, focus - as the voice from the whirlwind does - on animals. Job seems to, as well, when he enjoins his friends to "ask the beasts" at 12.7. (12.8 might refer to "the plants of the earth," too, but has historically been rendered "speak to the earth" [KJV].) In any case, that's before his ecological conversion. Perhaps future interpreters of Job will not just find that God led him to learn from the wild animals but also from plants! You'd have to interpolate. But there's grounds for it in these pre-conversion words of Job 14:
On a flat-footed reading, Job is proved wrong by the restoration of his health and, especially, his new family - new shoots from his stump. (Flat-footed in another way is to see this just as an intimation of immortality, that death is not final.) But suppose that future readers have come to know what Haskell has taught us about the relational individuality- and species-transcending life of plants. What might Job's post-ecological conversion understanding of his own life then be?
Might we learn what to hope for in the Anthropocene from the trees?
I can't claim to have contributed much: it was just a question to a panel, wondering if they found the recent literature on plants significant (they did not). I also asked a plant biologist turned Catholic theologian about it informally, and was told that the anthropomorphism involved in speaking of "the intelligence of plants" is unhelpful.
But I'd just finished David George Haskell's The Songs of Trees: Stories from Nature's Great Communicators, and it seemed unconscionable - and foolish - not to heed the voices of trees. Haskell's is a wonderful book in many ways, not least for its gorgeous writing. Hear him sing:
Ponderosa pine senses, integrates, weighs, and judges the world in a manner that combines external and internal intelligence. The ponderosa is networked to bacteria and fungi through every leaf and root. The tree also possesses its own hormonal, electrical, and chemical network. The trees' communicative processes are slower than animal nervous systems and they pervade branches and roots, rather than knotting themselves into brains. Like bacteria, they inhabit a reality alien to our own experience of the world. But trees are masters of integration, connecting and unselfing their cells into the soil, the sky, and thousands of other species. Because they are not mobile, to thrive they must know their particular locus on the earth far better than any wandering animal. Trees are the Platos of biology. Through their Dialogues, they are the best-placed creatures of all to make aesthetic and ethical judgments about beauty and good in the world.
Unlike Plato, who sought through beauty to find invariant universals that exist beyond the caved-in mess of human politics and society, ecological aesthetics and ethics emerge from relationships within life's community. They are context dependent, but a contingent near-universality may emerge when many parts of the network converge on similar judgments. (152-53)
Trees, it seemed to me at the conference, might be mediators - arbiters, even - between the time of humans and geological time. In any case, their thoroughly networked existence explodes the pretensions of species autarky, and, indeed, of individuality. His book, divided into chapters each dedicated to a particular tree with which he spent extended time over several years, starts in the Amazonian rainforest with the towering ceibo, home to a world of separate ecosystems.
It is perhaps no coincidence that the ceibo tree is the tree of life in the Waorani creation story. The tree is a hub for so many forest creatures, and it saves lives be maintaining and reconnecting life-giving threads.
This dissolution of individuality into relationship is how the ceibo and all its community survive the rigors of the forest. Where the art of war is so supremely well developed, survival paradoxically involves surrender, giving up the self in a union with allies. (16)
This "surrender" or "unselfing" (a term he borrows from moral philosopher Iris Murdoch) is at the heart of the stories Haskell tells, whether of social insects, symbioses of plants, animals and fungi, or - most provocatively - of the mysteriously emergent cooperation of individual (sic) components of plants, from roots and branches to the pores of leaves. Has it something to teach us about being human? It certainly has something tell us about life on earth, and how estranged from it our knotted brains and wandering hearts may have made us.
As I fiddle with making something more of my own presentation - a guess at how the Book of Job's song will be heard once people have accepted the realities of the Anthropocene - I'm tempted to make trees the hinge of the story. Most contemporary readers, if they attend to the many nature references in the text at all, focus - as the voice from the whirlwind does - on animals. Job seems to, as well, when he enjoins his friends to "ask the beasts" at 12.7. (12.8 might refer to "the plants of the earth," too, but has historically been rendered "speak to the earth" [KJV].) In any case, that's before his ecological conversion. Perhaps future interpreters of Job will not just find that God led him to learn from the wild animals but also from plants! You'd have to interpolate. But there's grounds for it in these pre-conversion words of Job 14:
7 “For there is hope for a tree,
if it is cut down, that it will sprout again,
and that its shoots will not cease.
if it is cut down, that it will sprout again,
and that its shoots will not cease.
8 Though its root grows old in the earth,
and its stump dies in the ground,
and its stump dies in the ground,
9 yet at the scent of water it will bud
and put forth branches like a young plant.
and put forth branches like a young plant.
10 But mortals die, and are laid low;
humans expire, and where are they?
humans expire, and where are they?
11 As waters fail from a lake,
and a river wastes away and dries up,
and a river wastes away and dries up,
12 so mortals lie down and do not rise again;
until the heavens are no more, they will not awake
or be roused out of their sleep. (NRSV)
until the heavens are no more, they will not awake
or be roused out of their sleep. (NRSV)
On a flat-footed reading, Job is proved wrong by the restoration of his health and, especially, his new family - new shoots from his stump. (Flat-footed in another way is to see this just as an intimation of immortality, that death is not final.) But suppose that future readers have come to know what Haskell has taught us about the relational individuality- and species-transcending life of plants. What might Job's post-ecological conversion understanding of his own life then be?
Might we learn what to hope for in the Anthropocene from the trees?
Wednesday, May 23, 2018
Tuesday, May 22, 2018
Monday, May 21, 2018
Anthropocene so white
The Bloomington conference on religious perspectives on the "age of humans" has finished. Is there a new field of Religion and Anthropocene whose birth I got to be part of? I'm not sure. Lots of religion wasn't represented (narry a non-North Atlantic tradition mentioned, if I can include Native North American traditions in that rubric). And we didn't really get into the argument about good or bad Anthropocene. So what did we do? We discussed industrial food production, paradigms of environmental ethics, science fiction, TEK (traditional ecological knowledge), transhumanism, ecological grief, eco-anxiety and hope, with scattered references to Donna Haraway, Clive Hamilton, Bruno Latour and - why not? - Hannah Arendt. (I mentioned Haraway in my futurist Job, too.) We also watched a rather appallingly fun movie.
What stayed with me was a talk by a British geographer Kathryn Yusoff, who pointed out that discussions of the Anthropocene are almost exclusively the province of white people. Every speaker had problematized "Anthropocene" for a thoughtless universalizing, lumping together the privileged few who are the drivers of anthropogenic change with the powerless many who suffer the brunt of the damage. We'd heard from Native scholars who observed that the dystopic lifeworld collapse the Anthropocene may portend for all of humanity has already been lived by colonized, indigenous and enslaved people for centuries. These were familiar arguments, but Yusoff framed her comments shatteringly with lines from Audre Lorde's poem "Litany for Survival":
And when the sun rises we are afraid
it might not remain
when the sun sets we are afraid
it might not rise in the morning
... and when we speak we are afraid
our words will not be heard
nor welcomed
but when we are silent
we are still afraid
So it is better to speak
remembering
we were never meant to survive
The Anthropocene theorists I've been engaging all assume we were meant to survive. But we're the same people who didn't mean for everyone to survive, who accepted the displacement and impoverishment of many others as the price of progress. We beat our breasts about the many others who will suffer more displacement and impoverishment because of climate change, extinction cascades, rising seas and the like. (Ugolino uncannily appropriate, indeed!) But in discussing the Anthropocene we assume the place of the future scientist looking back on this stage in earth's history (a morally chilling detachment we got to witness in the film's interviews with members of the stratigraphic commission): we assume we'll be among the survivors, or at least that the survivors will be like us.
And I was giving a talk presuming that the Book of Job will still be read, that there will still be people who identify with Job's story! As D. J. A. Clines has observed, there is hardly any text which more perfectly speaks of and to rich people trying to face down the thought that they might one day no longer be lords of the earth. While my projected future Job made room for others - animals (my Harawayan moment was "make kin, not babies"), and the hidden laboring classes of the world, symbolized by Mrs. Job - but the last, especially, sound like an afterthought. While claiming to mourn them as others don't, I still defaulted to the view that Job's first children were never meant to survive. I was still assuming that the story that matters is Job's. I have work to do!
(The picture is the cover of a book by a Finnish speaker. The title translates as Going to Hell? Environmental Attachment and Hope.)
What stayed with me was a talk by a British geographer Kathryn Yusoff, who pointed out that discussions of the Anthropocene are almost exclusively the province of white people. Every speaker had problematized "Anthropocene" for a thoughtless universalizing, lumping together the privileged few who are the drivers of anthropogenic change with the powerless many who suffer the brunt of the damage. We'd heard from Native scholars who observed that the dystopic lifeworld collapse the Anthropocene may portend for all of humanity has already been lived by colonized, indigenous and enslaved people for centuries. These were familiar arguments, but Yusoff framed her comments shatteringly with lines from Audre Lorde's poem "Litany for Survival":
And when the sun rises we are afraid
it might not remain
when the sun sets we are afraid
it might not rise in the morning
... and when we speak we are afraid
our words will not be heard
nor welcomed
but when we are silent
we are still afraid
So it is better to speak
remembering
we were never meant to survive
The Anthropocene theorists I've been engaging all assume we were meant to survive. But we're the same people who didn't mean for everyone to survive, who accepted the displacement and impoverishment of many others as the price of progress. We beat our breasts about the many others who will suffer more displacement and impoverishment because of climate change, extinction cascades, rising seas and the like. (Ugolino uncannily appropriate, indeed!) But in discussing the Anthropocene we assume the place of the future scientist looking back on this stage in earth's history (a morally chilling detachment we got to witness in the film's interviews with members of the stratigraphic commission): we assume we'll be among the survivors, or at least that the survivors will be like us.
And I was giving a talk presuming that the Book of Job will still be read, that there will still be people who identify with Job's story! As D. J. A. Clines has observed, there is hardly any text which more perfectly speaks of and to rich people trying to face down the thought that they might one day no longer be lords of the earth. While my projected future Job made room for others - animals (my Harawayan moment was "make kin, not babies"), and the hidden laboring classes of the world, symbolized by Mrs. Job - but the last, especially, sound like an afterthought. While claiming to mourn them as others don't, I still defaulted to the view that Job's first children were never meant to survive. I was still assuming that the story that matters is Job's. I have work to do!
(The picture is the cover of a book by a Finnish speaker. The title translates as Going to Hell? Environmental Attachment and Hope.)
Sunday, May 20, 2018
Saturday, May 19, 2018
Murals
Indiana has a set of Thomas Hart Benton murals, too! An originally 230 foot tableau of the 'Social History of Indiana' for the 1933 Chicago International Exposition is now spread over three buildings at IU, most of them in the 1941 auditorium whose vestibule was designed to house them. Hard to snap!
Friday, May 18, 2018
Dantesque
At the entrance to the Indiana Memorial Union, where our conference is taking place, a rather disturbing statue by Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux, sent from France in 1948 as thanks for postwar assistance of some kind. It's Ugolino and his sons - just right for a conference on religion and the Anthropo- cene...?
Thursday, May 17, 2018
Unmanned
I've arrived in Bloomington, Indiana for a conference called "Religious Perspectives and Alternative Futures in an Age of Humans." The somewhat awkward age of humans is a way of referring to the Anthropocene mindful of charge that the term homogenizes a state of affairs for which only some anthropoi are mainly responsible. In any case, I'm excited by the way the conference is framed:
I'm one of thirty-odd presenters, and we have enough time through Sunday to get to know each other at receptions (like the one where I found gingerbread anthropos). In my talk I'll be speculating about how the Book of Job might be read as our consciousness absorbs the significance of the "age of humans," offering these projections as an example of a sort of a semi-scifi "conjectural exegesis" of sacred texts which might help us make sense of what's going on and who we are in it.
Discourse of the Anthropocene resonates strongly with mythic and religious
genres—declensionist or ascendant storylines; tales of hubris, forbidden knowledge, theodicy
and eschatology—making the Anthropocene ripe for analysis by religion scholars. The
Anthropocene raises religious and ethical questions about how to understand humanity’s place
within planetary evolution, and how to envision the future trajectory of human societies.
Scholarly debates arise over dystopian and utopian visions; whether some human groups bear
greater moral responsibility than others for environmental harms stemming from colonialism,
capitalism, and industrialization; and whether the Anthropocene represents a spiritual
aggrandizement or condemnation of humanity. Our project assumes that these debates about
what it means to be human in an “Age of Humans” fall within the purview of religion,
philosophy, theology, and ethics.
I'm one of thirty-odd presenters, and we have enough time through Sunday to get to know each other at receptions (like the one where I found gingerbread anthropos). In my talk I'll be speculating about how the Book of Job might be read as our consciousness absorbs the significance of the "age of humans," offering these projections as an example of a sort of a semi-scifi "conjectural exegesis" of sacred texts which might help us make sense of what's going on and who we are in it.
Wednesday, May 16, 2018
Tuesday, May 15, 2018
In depth coverage
We're always told not judge a book by its cover, but consider the poor cook cover designer! Judged by the cover and by the book. A student in "Performing the Problem of Suffering: The Book of Job and the Arts"
took on the challenge of designing a new cover for the Book of Job (in the translation I recommend) and it's a dusey. As it leads you into the book, the cover unfolds and unfolds in a brilliant - and profound - way.
took on the challenge of designing a new cover for the Book of Job (in the translation I recommend) and it's a dusey. As it leads you into the book, the cover unfolds and unfolds in a brilliant - and profound - way.
Monday, May 14, 2018
Sunday, May 13, 2018
Saturday, May 12, 2018
Middle aged
Something in conversation over dinner tonight took me back to medieval times. Well, back when the Knights Templar set up a commanderie near the town of Arville, about 150km southwest of Paris, eight centuries ago. I spent one of my college summers there, volunteering at what I thought was a dig but was really a chantier, a construction site. As properly
trained folks fixed up the 12th century pigeónnier,
I manned a 20th century bétonnière. Mostly I remember the satisfied exhaustion at the end of a
day hauling bucket after bucket of sand, water and cement. (Sated by manual labor, a single novel lasted me the whole time, Anthony Burgess' Earthly Powers.) What else? I got to know yellow cherries, and the link between cérise and cérisier. At our final lunch I learned that yummy cervelles were in fact pig brains. Medieval!
Friday, May 11, 2018
Son of Earth
Finally getting around to reading Norman C. Habel's Finding Wisdom in Nature: An Eco-Wisdom Reading of the Book of Job, the extended analysis on which shorter essays I've been thrilled by build. Building on the approach of the Earth Bible commentaries Habel helped edit, this reading attends to Job as an "Earth being," and listens further to hear the voice of Earth in a narrative too long read anthropocentrically. While he starts with an account of 28, for him the hinge, the round of a U-shaped structure, I like the way his approach can change the way the story begins. Learn from him to hear what Job's first words are really saying
Naked I came from my mother's womb
and naked shall I return there.
The Lord has given and the Lord has taken away,
blessed by the name of the Lord (Job 1.21).
Each chapter of Habel's book ends with a poetic "Retrieval," in the voice of the Earth.
The Voice of Earth
I am Earth, Job's mother,
and the source of life for all Earth beings.
it delights me that Job,
an Earth bring with genuine integrity,
a wise man who spurns evil,
identifies with me as his mother
after a vicious round of disasters.
Job blesses a sky being he calls Yhwh,
his perceived overlord in heaven above,
but he stays true to me
with his roots deep in Earth.
I am insulted by his God
who is willing to violate an Earth being
and his family of Earth beings
for his own celestial pleasure.
Such cruel folly!
The disasters that befell Job
are not disasters that arise from Earth
as part of my natural order,
an order that reflects innate wisdom.
The disasters portrayed
are unwarranted interventions of God,
including ferocious fire from heaven.
These actions are not only acts of
divine injustice and celestial folly
against Job as an Earth being,
they also cause me to suffer without justification.
I may suffer when humans abuse me.
I suffer even more when God is the culprit.
After a second act of divine injustice,
I felt for Job
whose flesh was violated with unwarranted boils.
In his agony Job joins me again,
sits on the ground surrounded by ashes.
Through all of this agony,
Job has been a man of integrity,
true to himself and true to me.
How, I wonder, will Job relate to me
after his seven days of mourning
when he begins to vent his anger?
Not great poetry, perhaps, but compelling in its own way. I wonder, too, how this Job, child of Earth, will understand the caprices of the sky being, a being Whose wisdom, too (according to Habel's reading of chapter 28), was found and resides in Earth?
Naked I came from my mother's womb
and naked shall I return there.
The Lord has given and the Lord has taken away,
blessed by the name of the Lord (Job 1.21).
Job's response is depicted here as relatively submissive. God seems to be winning the wager. ... The reading, however, is not that simple. ... In his devastating grief, Job identifies with Earth as his mother, the source of his being and the womb to which he will return in death.
By identifying with Earth, Job hints that his primary allegiance is with Earth not with heaven. Job is an Earth being suffering without cause along with other Earth beings. Job dares to name his mother, Earth, in the moment of extreme anguish. In so doing, Job suggests that his mother too suffers when her children are treated with cruel abandon by their celestial overlord.
Each chapter of Habel's book ends with a poetic "Retrieval," in the voice of the Earth.
The Voice of Earth
I am Earth, Job's mother,
and the source of life for all Earth beings.
it delights me that Job,
an Earth bring with genuine integrity,
a wise man who spurns evil,
identifies with me as his mother
after a vicious round of disasters.
Job blesses a sky being he calls Yhwh,
his perceived overlord in heaven above,
but he stays true to me
with his roots deep in Earth.
I am insulted by his God
who is willing to violate an Earth being
and his family of Earth beings
for his own celestial pleasure.
Such cruel folly!
The disasters that befell Job
are not disasters that arise from Earth
as part of my natural order,
an order that reflects innate wisdom.
The disasters portrayed
are unwarranted interventions of God,
including ferocious fire from heaven.
These actions are not only acts of
divine injustice and celestial folly
against Job as an Earth being,
they also cause me to suffer without justification.
I may suffer when humans abuse me.
I suffer even more when God is the culprit.
After a second act of divine injustice,
I felt for Job
whose flesh was violated with unwarranted boils.
In his agony Job joins me again,
sits on the ground surrounded by ashes.
Through all of this agony,
Job has been a man of integrity,
true to himself and true to me.
How, I wonder, will Job relate to me
after his seven days of mourning
when he begins to vent his anger?
Not great poetry, perhaps, but compelling in its own way. I wonder, too, how this Job, child of Earth, will understand the caprices of the sky being, a being Whose wisdom, too (according to Habel's reading of chapter 28), was found and resides in Earth?
(Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014), 32, 34
Thursday, May 10, 2018
Class act
A little muffled because of the student academic workers' strike and many faculty (including yours truly) holding class off-campus so as not to cross their picket line, the academic year is coming to a close.
"Performing the Problem of Suffering: The Book of Job and the Arts" effectively wound up on Monday, with a remarkable showcase of student creative projects. Ranging from engraved wood inspired by Jung's Answer to Job to a near-operatic scene of a livid Mrs Job, by way of a video game, a chapbook weaving Job with Mary Oliver and a short film of interviews, it was an impressive display. I'm planning on taking several of them with me to Beijing, where I'll be teaching a course on similar, if less religious, matters this July. It was gratifying to get to know the students through these final projects - since the course was a lecture, I didn't have the satisfaction of a personal relationship unfolding over the semester. But the quality and seriousness of these projects confirms that the class was an occasion for meaningful and open-ended exploration - at least for those students who volunteered to share their work with the wider class.
"Religion and Ecology" ended in Union Square today, with final reflections and snacks. In the shimmering shade of new green, as tree seeds and the occasional wasp wafted by, the class plighted their troth to ecological awareness and to New York City. "Bioregionalism" and the embedded ethics of indigenous peoples appealed to them, but, really, the city is where they want to be. It's part of nature too, after all - let's find ways of making our cities ecological! What about religion, I asked, interjecting everything from Ramadan to older Hindus' withdrawal from the world to Japanese linguistic fillips of gratitude to the sacrifice of the first born, but we've been there done that. Apparently it was good to learn about different traditions' ways of making sense of our planetary existence - especially the 'liquid ecology' of Daoism and the 'honorable harvest' of Native American nations - but none of them seems to help much in practice. Still, it's good to acknowledge the ecological crisis as a spiritual one, as connected to spiritual questions and practices.
I must have been doing something right: there seem to be students from both classes signed up for "Theorizing Religion" this Fall!
"Performing the Problem of Suffering: The Book of Job and the Arts" effectively wound up on Monday, with a remarkable showcase of student creative projects. Ranging from engraved wood inspired by Jung's Answer to Job to a near-operatic scene of a livid Mrs Job, by way of a video game, a chapbook weaving Job with Mary Oliver and a short film of interviews, it was an impressive display. I'm planning on taking several of them with me to Beijing, where I'll be teaching a course on similar, if less religious, matters this July. It was gratifying to get to know the students through these final projects - since the course was a lecture, I didn't have the satisfaction of a personal relationship unfolding over the semester. But the quality and seriousness of these projects confirms that the class was an occasion for meaningful and open-ended exploration - at least for those students who volunteered to share their work with the wider class.
"Religion and Ecology" ended in Union Square today, with final reflections and snacks. In the shimmering shade of new green, as tree seeds and the occasional wasp wafted by, the class plighted their troth to ecological awareness and to New York City. "Bioregionalism" and the embedded ethics of indigenous peoples appealed to them, but, really, the city is where they want to be. It's part of nature too, after all - let's find ways of making our cities ecological! What about religion, I asked, interjecting everything from Ramadan to older Hindus' withdrawal from the world to Japanese linguistic fillips of gratitude to the sacrifice of the first born, but we've been there done that. Apparently it was good to learn about different traditions' ways of making sense of our planetary existence - especially the 'liquid ecology' of Daoism and the 'honorable harvest' of Native American nations - but none of them seems to help much in practice. Still, it's good to acknowledge the ecological crisis as a spiritual one, as connected to spiritual questions and practices.
I must have been doing something right: there seem to be students from both classes signed up for "Theorizing Religion" this Fall!
Wednesday, May 09, 2018
Saecula saeculorum
Beat the crowds to the Cloisters part of the Met's summer blockbuster "Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination" - indeed, I often had rooms to myself! (Others were doubtless taking in the Members Preview at the Fifth Avenue Met.) The placement was tasteful once you get used to the idea that once sacred works in a place like the
Met are just cultural objects shared with the general public, objects which fashion designers might be inspired by, engage in dialogue with or
- of course - desecrate. The Cloisters itself has a faux sacred air,
but the ease with which it has been coopted as a setting for couture suggests this apparent sacredness extends as easily to secular luxury as to humble devotion. Fittingly (sic), a medley of sacred music, opera and film scores floats through this usually silent space. Like the Chinese Buddhas conscripted for the last big fashion blockbuster, the Christian figures here seem just to be gritting their teeth: this, too, shall pass.Monday, May 07, 2018
Sunday, May 06, 2018
Saturday, May 05, 2018
Ecological aesthetics
We're not palms, able to jump among beaches through wave-bobbing and bird-winged seeds.
One of many breathtakingly poetic sentences in my new book crush, David George Haskells' The Songs of Trees: Stories from Nature's Great Connectors (Penguin, 2017). The chapter on the sabal palm (and on the rising seas and vanishing beaches and wetlands) continues
But as the ocean unsettles the old human order, we might attend to the trees, not to mimic them but to better understand life on the shore. Sabal palm has learned to thrive amid changeability. ...
The biblical parable can be reworked. The fool is not the person who builds on sand. The error is to believe that sand can be rock. (81)
One of many breathtakingly poetic sentences in my new book crush, David George Haskells' The Songs of Trees: Stories from Nature's Great Connectors (Penguin, 2017). The chapter on the sabal palm (and on the rising seas and vanishing beaches and wetlands) continues
But as the ocean unsettles the old human order, we might attend to the trees, not to mimic them but to better understand life on the shore. Sabal palm has learned to thrive amid changeability. ...
The biblical parable can be reworked. The fool is not the person who builds on sand. The error is to believe that sand can be rock. (81)
Thursday, May 03, 2018
Wednesday, May 02, 2018
Strike?
The end of an academic year is usually an emotional roller coaster. Classes are coming to a close, in sweetness and glory ... or at least relief. Committees are realizing what they've achieved, if anything. (What a lot of committees I've been on this year, and what a lot of time and goodwill has been squandered in them!) The agitation of graduates about to bid farewell, new horizons and new uncertainties beckoning, is sensed by all..
But this year's ending is fixing to be rather more exciting than usual. Student academic workers - graduate teaching fellows and graduate and undergraduate research assistants - have recently unionized and have been negotiating a contract with the university administration. The administration, which has fought the campaign from the start, are stalling, perhaps hoping that the onset of summer will dissipate the mobilized energy. (This must be page one of every university administrator's handbook.) But the student union is wise to this trick, and so is threatening a grading strike, to start next Tuesday - one week before the end of classes. No agreement will mean students in classes graded by graduate students won't get their grades. The faculty has been asked to support the likely strike by not making contingency plans, and by not crossing the picket lines at the entrances to our main buildings should the strike happen. A strike would cause turmoil and distress, especially for students needing to present final work and send off transcripts, but that's sort of the point. "It's supposed to get ugly," one of my tenured colleagues observed with satisfaction.
By happy coincidence, my classes won't be so disrupted. The "Job and the Arts" class meets Monday, just before the strike. (Grades would have to be submitted by the graduate student teaching assistants, though, so might not happen for a while.) "Religion and ecology" had its final presentations this week, and we have a blog we can use in lieu of a classroom next week. But many of my faculty colleagues face starker choices. The student academic workers union hopes they'll hold class off-campus, but there aren't spaces enough in parks and cafes around school, certainly not spaces conducive to media-rich final presentations. I hope the prospect of protracted "ugliness" will push the administration to negotiation in good faith to avert it.
But this year's ending is fixing to be rather more exciting than usual. Student academic workers - graduate teaching fellows and graduate and undergraduate research assistants - have recently unionized and have been negotiating a contract with the university administration. The administration, which has fought the campaign from the start, are stalling, perhaps hoping that the onset of summer will dissipate the mobilized energy. (This must be page one of every university administrator's handbook.) But the student union is wise to this trick, and so is threatening a grading strike, to start next Tuesday - one week before the end of classes. No agreement will mean students in classes graded by graduate students won't get their grades. The faculty has been asked to support the likely strike by not making contingency plans, and by not crossing the picket lines at the entrances to our main buildings should the strike happen. A strike would cause turmoil and distress, especially for students needing to present final work and send off transcripts, but that's sort of the point. "It's supposed to get ugly," one of my tenured colleagues observed with satisfaction.
By happy coincidence, my classes won't be so disrupted. The "Job and the Arts" class meets Monday, just before the strike. (Grades would have to be submitted by the graduate student teaching assistants, though, so might not happen for a while.) "Religion and ecology" had its final presentations this week, and we have a blog we can use in lieu of a classroom next week. But many of my faculty colleagues face starker choices. The student academic workers union hopes they'll hold class off-campus, but there aren't spaces enough in parks and cafes around school, certainly not spaces conducive to media-rich final presentations. I hope the prospect of protracted "ugliness" will push the administration to negotiation in good faith to avert it.