Gold rush

It happens every year, but late fall ginkgos can be quite dramatic. (I remember streets of gold from when I lived closer to street level!)

Bootleg

The "Practicing Curation" class has offered "A Bootleg Exhibition of the Orozco Room" in a naturally lit basement room. They hung textile reproductions of the original murals - inaccessible during a long process of restoration - around a seating area to try to recreate the way the murals were part of social life at The New School in its first decades, at least until the yellow curtain era, described in an explanatory pamphlet. 

It's quite successful in its bootleg way. The reproduced murals are even more immersive than the originals, which sit a little higher on the walls and are ventilated by windows on either side of the "Table of Universal Brotherhood." I wonder if it was also intentionally that the murals to left and right were inverted. I know two students in the class, will ask! 

Change of season

Revolving doors

The Metropolitan Museum of Art's great for crazy juxtapositions. Here I juxtapose two already juxtaposed things from recently opened exhibitions on subjects worlds and millennia apart, Divine Egypt and Man Ray: When Objects Dream. Above is an apparently unfinished but much-touched 3000-year-old statue (on loan from the Louvre) of four aspects of the goddess Hathor - a crowned cow surrounded by serpent-, lion- and human-headed manifestations. Entirely unrelated but somehow resonant in my image-saturated mind, Man Ray's 1916 collage-like painting "Legend," source of one of the brightly colored prints in his almost animated 1919 "Revolving Doors" (the exhibit's recreation of which someone kindly filmed). Have these less than nothing to do with each other? Precisely. For good or ill, a museum like the Met functions like a collage, a revolving door, maybe a many-faced goddess.

Redesigning curricular systems and well-being

The liberal arts world is in a tizzy over a proposed reorganization of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Montclair State, which would rehome (or perhaps dissolve) nineteen departments in four new schools. Besides the two provisionally-named schools in the rather dark graphic from the Chronicle of Higher Education above (final names to be decided by the faculty involved), there would be

{Human Narratives and Creative Expressions}

English; Classics & General Humanities; Philosophy; World Languages & Cultures; Spanish & Latino Studies

 

{Interdisciplinary Programs and Writing Studies}

BA in Interdisciplinary Studies; Medical Humanities; Gender, Sexuality & Women's Studies; Writing Studies; Language; Business & Culture

The reorganization has been rejected by the Montclair State faculty, their Senate demanding that disciplinary chairs at least be retained. But the plan (led by a professor of Religious Studies, for what it's worth!) has been offered as a way of trying to save these areas of the curriculum which, at Montclair as nationwide, have seen steep declines in majors. Not only students but younger faculty, too, are already more interdisciplinary in orientation, the proposers argue, and might flourish in these new constellations, freed from the drag of departmental structures. But would this be new curricular freedom or just a new kind of constraint, now by administrators freed from faculty oversight?

The question isn't just academic. Similar things are happening elsewhere, including just 20 miles to the west, chez nous at The New School. 

The university restructuring plan, details of which were officially announced in various larger and smaller meetings this week, will see the shuttering, at least as distinct undergraduate majors, of several small social science departments, with the implications of the consolidations of several humanities programs still up in the air. We're told a budget crisis makes already planned changes more urgent than ever, but nobody quite knows what's going on.

Our provost argues that the last nine years have seen an "unnatural stasis" in our "academic portfolio." "Change," he reminds us somewhat oxymoronically, is "in the DNA" of the school! Meanwhile the president argues that a bright new future lies in defining the "distinctive proposition" of a liberal arts college in a university primarily committed to art and design. I'm not averse to such a reorientation (which isn't to say there'd necessarily be a place for me in it) but the faculty as a whole is restive, and anxious for our future. Is the plan really to save the social science and humanities programs or to do them in?

Aflame

Religious revival meeting!

This was the week for the first years in "DIY Religion" to present what they learned from interviewing fifteen of our alums. We have more work to do, drawing some more general conclusions from what were apparently warm and thoughtful conversations; that's work for next week. For this week we basked in the idiosyncratic accomplishments and inspiring ideas of our fabulous alums! 

We got the world religions in there too, somehow - and then some! Our fifteen included folks who've found their DIY way to being a devotée of Guanyin, an Islamic feminist, the director of an avant garde theater company inspired by Jewish textual exegesis, an intimate of Ram Dass, three Christian priests (MCC, Episcopal and... it's complicated), a Radical Faerie, a rap-recording reviver of traditional Taíno language and spirituality and a young Zoroastrian. Wow...!

Fly me to the moon

"It's so cool how faculty advertise their courses here," one of my first years enthused. 

Having done my fair share of flyering in recent weeks, I didn't have the heart to tell her that this is exceptional, a response to the provost's threat to cancel classes which don't get at least 75% enrollment.

Plutocracy blues

Mood these days? Check out this image from this month's cover article in the progressive Christian magazine Sojourners, "The Big Steal: How Billionnaires are Upending our Lives and our Economy."

Passing storm

Between seasons

Govern this!

Not perhaps the best designed visuals for our Faculty Senate-run Governance Day, but it was good to see a significant turnout, and to remember together that higher education is practically unique in being a self-governed industry, at least in part. There is work to do!

Not the least of our challenges - working out who can be elected to represent whom in the new restructured dispensation. Apparently our move to the "two college model" proposed by the president "as thought-starter only" at the start of the summer is as good as decided.