It's not that I didn't find works to like, such as "Landscape from Saint-Rémy" (June 1889), from the section of the exhibition where cypresses are not the main concern. (This was included also because its landscape is a precursor to the painting at the center of this show.)
Arguably the cypress wasn't a particular object of the luminous "Tree in the Garden of the Asylum" (October 1889) either, where leaves of all colors are dancing together in a bath of light and wind. Cypresses were around, but so were olives and mulberries. I wasn't convinced they were of special interest.
Except in one place, a small canvas he painted while confined to his room in April 1890, "Reminiscence of Brabant." There are many
more colors here than initially meet the eye, but this landscape shows a different, duller world. Except for the cypresses which have snuck in at the left!
What are they doing there? Now I'm interested. Or could have been... Reviews I've read of the show are similarly unpersuaded by its premise, if grateful for the chance to spend time with a concentration of works by a great artist. For my part I wonder that the show didn't bother to tell us anything about cypresses - what they look like, how they've otherwise been represented, how they are like and unlike other trees in Van Gogh's oeuvre and imagination.